How to Use Unique Constraint in SQL

By Cristian G. Guasch • Updated: 03/03/24 • 10 min read

Navigating the world of SQL can sometimes feel like you’re trying to solve a complex puzzle. But when it comes to ensuring data integrity and uniqueness, the UNIQUE constraint is your best friend. I’ve been there, wrestling with databases, and I’m here to guide you through using this powerful tool effectively.

The UNIQUE constraint is crucial for preventing duplicate entries in your database columns, which is key to maintaining clean and reliable data. Whether you’re a budding developer or a seasoned data architect, understanding how to implement this constraint can significantly impact your database’s performance and accuracy. Let’s dive into the nuts and bolts of using the SQL UNIQUE constraint, ensuring your data stands out for all the right reasons.

Understanding the SQL UNIQUE Constraint

When I dive into the mechanics of the SQL UNIQUE constraint, it’s essential to grasp that it’s all about ensuring data uniqueness across a database table’s specific column or group of columns. This constraint plays a pivotal role in maintaining the integrity of your data by preventing duplicate entries which could potentially skew your data analysis or application logic.

Let’s take a closer look with some examples. Imagine I’m setting up a database for a membership site. To ensure each member has a unique email address, I’d utilize the UNIQUE constraint like so:

MemberID int NOT NULL,
Email varchar(255) UNIQUE,
FirstName varchar(255),
LastName varchar(255),

This snippet creates a table where each member’s email address must be unique. But what if I need to enforce uniqueness on multiple columns? Suppose members could have multiple roles and I wish to ensure that a combination of member ID and role type is unique. I’d adjust my approach as follows:

CREATE TABLE MemberRoles (
MemberID int,
RoleType varchar(255),
UNIQUE(MemberID, RoleType)

Here, the UNIQUE constraint ensures a member cannot be assigned the same role more than once. It’s applying the constraint to a combination of columns, illustrating the flexibility of the UNIQUE constraint.

A common mistake I’ve seen involves misunderstanding the difference between the UNIQUE constraint and primary keys. Remember, a table can have multiple UNIQUE constraints, but only one primary key. Another pitfall is neglecting the NULL value behavior; a UNIQUE constraint allows multiple NULL values unless specified otherwise.

Implementing the UNIQUE constraint correctly ensures your data remains reliable and clean. From creating a simple user registration system to complex systems requiring data integrity across multiple fields, mastering this constraint is a fundamental skill I recommend every developer, data analyst, and database architect to refine.

Importance of Data Integrity

In the realm of database management, data integrity stands as a pillar ensuring the accuracy, consistency, and reliability of data stored across various databases. For me, understanding the Importance of Data Integrity is crucial, not just in maintaining the quality of data but also in facilitating effective decision-making processes based on that data. Implementing SQL UNIQUE constraints plays a significant role in this, as it directly impacts the integrity by preventing duplicate entries in a database table.

Let’s consider a practical example. Suppose I’m setting up a database for a membership site, and it’s vital that each member’s email address remains unique within the system. This is where SQL UNIQUE constraints come into play:

MemberID int NOT NULL,
Email varchar(255) UNIQUE,
FirstName varchar(255),
LastName varchar(255),

In this scenario, trying to insert a new member with an existing email address in the Email column will result in an error, thereby maintaining the uniqueness and integrity of member data.

However, it’s not uncommon to encounter variations and common mistakes in the application of UNIQUE constraints. A common variation includes defining a UNIQUE constraint on multiple columns, ensuring a unique combination of values across those columns:

CREATE TABLE Registrations (
RegistrationID int NOT NULL,
EventID int NOT NULL,
AttendeeID int NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (RegistrationID),
UNIQUE (EventID, AttendeeID)

This ensures an attendee can’t register for the same event more than once. A common mistake, however, is overlooking the fact that SQL allows multiple NULL values in a column defined as UNIQUE, assuming all NULLs to be different. For columns that shouldn’t allow NULLs at all, it’s crucial to also set them as NOT NULL:

MODIFY Email varchar(255) UNIQUE NOT NULL;

By sharing my experiences and insights, I aim to highlight not only the versatility and power of the UNIQUE constraint in SQL but also the nuances involved in its implementation. Whether it’s setting up databases for web applications, ensuring data cleanliness in analytics projects, or maintaining the integrity of financial records, understanding and correctly applying UNIQUE constraints is a valuable skill for anyone working with SQL databases.

Syntax for Implementing the UNIQUE Constraint

When it comes to ensuring data integrity in your databases, knowing how to properly implement the UNIQUE constraint is key. This constraint prevents duplicate entries in a column or a set of columns, which is paramount for maintaining the uniqueness of each record.

To get started, let’s dive into the basic syntax for adding a UNIQUE constraint to a single column. You’d typically do this at the time of table creation. Here’s how it looks:

UserID int NOT NULL,
Email varchar(255) UNIQUE,
UserName varchar(255),

In this example, the Email column will not accept duplicate values, ensuring that all email addresses in the Users table are unique. It’s a straightforward method that’s highly effective for individual columns.

But what about when you want to ensure uniqueness across multiple columns? This scenario is common in many applications, such as when you’re recording transactions or events. In such cases, you’d implement the UNIQUE constraint across multiple columns like this:

CREATE TABLE Registrations (
RegistrationID int NOT NULL,
EventID int,
UserID int,
PRIMARY KEY (RegistrationID),
UNIQUE (EventID, UserID)

This setup guarantees that a user can register only once for an event, as the combination of EventID and UserID must be unique.

However, it’s crucial not to overlook common mistakes when using UNIQUE constraints. For instance, if you don’t carefully consider which columns truly need uniqueness, you may end up with more constraints than necessary, which can impact database performance. Moreover, remember that NULL values are considered distinct in a UNIQUE constraint, which means if you’re not careful, multiple rows with NULL in a UNIQUE column might pass your intended restrictions.

Further enhancing your database design, you might sometimes need to add a UNIQUE constraint to an existing table. Here’s how to do it:


By using the ALTER TABLE statement, you can add a UNIQUE constraint to the Email column of the Members table, even after it has been created. This flexibility is invaluable for refining your database schema as your application evolves.

Getting the hang of implementing the UNIQUE constraint takes practice, but it’s an essential tool in your SQL toolkit.

Handling Unique Constraints in Different Database Systems

When adding unique constraints to a SQL database, it’s crucial to remember that not all database systems handle them in the same way. I’ve navigated the syntax and peculiarities of different systems and here’s what I’ve found to be most effective.

SQL Server

In SQL Server, uniqueness can be enforced both at the column and table levels. Here’s a simple example for adding a unique constraint to a single column during table creation:

CREATE TABLE Employees (

To add a unique constraint to multiple columns, making their combined values unique, the syntax slightly changes:

OrderNumber INT NOT NULL,
CustomerID INT,
CONSTRAINT UC_Order UNIQUE (OrderNumber, CustomerID)

A common mistake in SQL Server is forgetting that the UNIQUE constraint does not ignore NULL values, meaning multiple NULL entries can violate the uniqueness rule.


PostgreSQL treats NULL values in unique constraints differently, allowing multiple NULL values in a column defined as UNIQUE. Here’s an example for a single-column unique constraint:


For multi-column constraints in PostgreSQL, it’s similar to SQL Server:

CREATE TABLE Reservations (
GuestID INT,
CONSTRAINT UC_Reservation UNIQUE (GuestID, RoomID)

Where people often go wrong with PostgreSQL is in assuming that all database systems treat NULL values in a unique constraint the same way PostgreSQL does, which isn’t the case.


MySQL allows for the enforcement of unique constraints but requires careful management when dealing with NULL values. Here’s an example adding a unique constraint upon table creation:

CREATE TABLE Customers (
PhoneNumber VARCHAR(15) UNIQUE

A crucial aspect to understand in MySQL is its handling of unique constraints on columns that can have NULL values. MySQL allows multiple NULL values in a unique column, similar to PostgreSQL.

Best Practices for Utilizing the UNIQUE Constraint

When it comes to ensuring data integrity in your database, the UNIQUE constraint is a powerful tool. I’ve learned through experience that applying it correctly can save both time and headaches. Here are my go-to strategies for making the most out of the UNIQUE constraint.

Use UNIQUE Constraints Wisely

Not every column needs a UNIQUE constraint. It’s crucial to apply it to columns that genuinely require uniqueness for each row. Common candidates include email addresses, usernames, or any other field where duplicate values could cause issues.

Username VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE,

This example ensures that both username and email fields in the Users table are unique, preventing duplicates and preserving data integrity.

Avoid Common Pitfalls

A frequent mistake is overlooking NULL values. In SQL Server, for instance, if you’re not careful, you could end up with multiple rows having NULL in a column defined as UNIQUE. However, this behavior varies across database systems – PostgreSQL and MySQL handle NULL values in unique constraints differently.

-- SQL Server example
-- Inserting multiple NULL values into ColB won't raise an error in PostgreSQL and MySQL but will do so in SQL Server without proper handling.

Handle NULL Values Intelligently

To effectively manage NULL values, especially in systems like SQL Server, consider using filtered indexes or composite keys that include a non-nullable column.

-- SQL Server filtered index to allow multiple NULLs

Such a strategy ensures that you can have multiple NULL values without violating the uniqueness constraint, offering flexibility in how you approach data modeling and ensuring compatibility across different database systems.

By keeping these best practices in mind, you’re better equipped to utilize the UNIQUE constraint to its fullest potential, enhancing your database’s reliability and your applications’ integrity.


Mastering the UNIQUE constraint is crucial for maintaining data integrity and ensuring your database operates smoothly. I’ve shared insights on applying this constraint judiciously and navigating common pitfalls, especially around NULL values. Remember, the key is to use UNIQUE constraints on columns that truly need to be unique, like email addresses or usernames. By adopting strategies like filtered indexes or composite keys, you’ll be better equipped to handle NULL values and uphold the integrity of your database. Embracing these best practices will not only enhance your database’s reliability but also bolster the overall integrity of your applications across various database systems.

Related articles